![]() ![]() Hany Farid, Reining in Online Abuses, 19 Tech. ![]() Researcher Hany Farid and Microsoft developed a digital fingerprinting technology called photoDNA in 2009. The Pilotĭespite the legendarily ruthless competitiveness of Silicon Valley, platforms have long cooperated on the removal of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). But from small beginnings, content cartels are enveloping ever more difficult and contentious areas of online discourse. They are also fragmented rather than a single cartel-like agreement between set members, these arrangements are taking place in different ways in different spheres. These don't resemble traditional cartels: They are not hidden but touted, and they are widely seen as beneficial or even necessary. The past few years have seen increasing demands for platforms to collaborate in fending off certain perceived threats created by online speech. We need not settle for institutions that stick band-aids on some problems but do not serve the deeper goal of building trust in online speech governance. This is a pivotal moment in the management of public discourse, and the structures built now should serve enduring values. The second is to explore what can be beneficial about collaborative efforts and what might redeem them. The first is to raise the alarm about a possible future coming into view, of unaccountable content cartels making decisions about the parameters of online discourse in a way that is just as problematic as an unaccountable monopoly. Part IV sets an agenda for developing the tools to create productive and legitimate cooperation between platforms in those areas where it can be beneficial or has become inevitable. Part III explores the failures of the current arrangements and the threats they pose to free speech. Part II examines the impulses behind demands for greater cooperation and the ways in which such cooperation can be beneficial. In this paper, I begin by tracing the origin and spread of content cartels in Part I, showing that content cartels are the proposed response to an increasing number of pathologies in online discourse. But they share the characteristic that they compound the existing lack of accountability in platform content moderation. These come in various guises they can be demanded, encouraged, participated in, or unheeded by regulators. I call these content cartels: arrangements between platforms to work together to remove content or actors from their services without adequate oversight. The pressure to do something can lead to the creation of systems and structures that serve the interests of the very tech platforms that they seek to rein in. Currently, most collaboration takes the form of rushed ad hoc alliances of convenience that arise in response to particular crises. Collaboration between tech platforms on especially intractable problems allows us to break free of the false dichotomy between too few online gatekeepers holding too much power, on the one hand, and a fragmented online public sphere constituted by multiple fiercely competitive platforms, on the other.īut this collaboration must be done in a way that keeps a broader sense of the public interest at its core. Economic competition alone cannot solve many of the speech-related pathologies in online discourse. These are questions that need answering as society and regulators demand that platforms become more responsible gatekeepers. To what extent should platforms have consistent content moderation policies? If standards and guardrails are imposed on the public sphere, should platforms work together to ensure that the online ecosystem as a whole realizes these standards, or would society benefit more if it is every platform for itself? These pressures are not necessarily at odds, but some work needs to be done to reconcile them. At the same time, others are demanding greater cooperation between the custodians of the public sphere. The fear that a single actor can decide what can or cannot be said in large parts of the online public sphere has led to growing calls for measures to promote competition between digital platforms. An essay series addressing the tech giants' power to shape public discourse Introduction
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |